Notebook
January 4th, 2008 by Bradley Hagan

In The Empire Strikes Back, Luke Skywalker crash lands his X-wing fighter in Dagobah and begins his training with Yoda, the Jedi Master. His training comprises various physical and mental conditioning including using the Force to move rocks without physically lifting them. Later on, Luke needs to use the Force to lift his X-wing fighter (weighing several tons) out of the swamp it has sunk into. Luke, recognizing the feat required, says doubtfully “All right, I’ll give it a try.” Yoda emphatically retorts “No! Try not. Do or do not. There is no try.” As a Christian, I now think of this statement in terms of what it takes to be saved from God’s wrath. My Christian modification is “Do (trust in God’s grace), or do not (trust in God’s grace). There is no try (to trust in God’s grace).

Let’s examine this statement in three parts. First, there are those people who do trust in God’s grace to be saved. This group believes what the Apostle Paul says in Ephesians “Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath. But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions – it is by grace you have been saved.” Ephesians 2:3-5. Before a person is even born, he has been declared evil in the courts of heaven. This isn’t after a certain age, after he learns right from wrong, but at the instant his soul exists. Since we inherit Adam’s sin, we start out with a bad record, and because the bible tells us that our good deeds can never wipe this record clean, salvation must be by God’s grace alone. “But if it (God’s acceptance) is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace. Romans 11:6.

The second part of the statement refers to those who do not trust in God’s grace. They adamantly deny the need for Christ and God’s grace. They have not been given eyes to recognize their sin and therefore have no reason to desire mercy. Examples of this group are belief systems like Buddhism, Muslim, Hinduism, New Age, Existentialism, Atheism, and a whole host of pagan religions. This group is proud to say they are not trusting in God’s grace and if there is an afterlife, they will earn salvation through their own merit. Often, these are simply the Han Solos of the world. In Star Wars Episode IV, Han Solo laughs at Luke’s Jedi training and says, “Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.” When questioned about believing in the Force, he says “Kid, I’ve flown from one side of this galaxy to the other. I’ve seen a lot of strange stuff, but I’ve never seen anything to make me believe there’s one all-powerful force controlling everything. There’s no mystical energy field that controls my destiny. It’s all a lot of simple tricks and nonsense.” This is a popular opinion of Christianity and people especially balk at the required humility that accompanies it. In Han Solo terms, they think the Lord’s grace is no match for being wealthy, talented, beautiful, self-determining, or in any way admired in the world’s eyes.

Nevertheless, it is the third choice, try to trust in God’s grace, that so many professing believers commit to and sadly end up straddling the fence between Christianity and salvation by works. They want to hedge their bets by saying they believe in Jesus, but continue to rely on basically being a good person. Attend any church in America and you will probably find at least one person who falls into this category. I have family, friends, and acquaintances who attend church on Sundays, but show no real evidence in their lives as a whole that proves they love Jesus. “A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.” Matthew 7:18-20. In addition, this group frequently points to the commands of God that they keep (at least externally). These usually fall on the quite serious side of the sin spectrum, e.g., stealing, adultery, murder, etc. Interestingly enough, these commands are also the ones that society punishes people for or at least places a stigma upon. The real reason these people avoid sin is not due to a love for Jesus, but so they can remain comfortable and happy.

The main difference in the actions of true believers and false ones is the motivation for what they do. “So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.” 1 Corinthians 10:31. Are they doing it because they have been rescued from the flames and thus they want to show gratitude by obeying this God they love? Or is it that they view themselves as, in essence, descent people especially compared to others and consequently want to prove to God, themselves, and everyone watching that they are good. It always comes down to what is your heart saying inside? Do you smile at your neighbor while cursing him inside? Do you work hard at your job just to get praises and a good raise? Do you not cheat on your taxes so you won’t go to jail?

This is why people can’t be saved by trying to trust in grace. You either do or you don’t, you either love God or you don’t, you either obey for the right reasons or you don’t, you either go to heaven or you go to hell. When all is said and done and Jesus comes back to judge, he will not invite those who have drug his name through the mud all their lives. These are people who say they love Jesus, but care more about living for themselves than for him. Furthermore, God will save using his method not ours. We cannot create our own version of Christianity, one which allows us to do whatever we want on earth, and in the end, get saved by grace. In Romans chapter 3, verses 7 and 8, the Apostle Paul warns those who think that they can live by their own terms and still rely on grace. His final words are “Their condemnation is deserved”.
God never designed for man to be saved by being good. During all of the Old Covenant era, his rules were simply given to show how futile it is to try to earn your way to God. Only after someone has hit rock bottom in his own attempts to be holy will he then see his need for Jesus. For the unbeliever, God’s rules should be so paralyzingly impossible to keep, that the single alternative is to seek God’s inexhaustible grace. “Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. Galatians 3:23-24. “Try to be a good person.” is the most popular answer I get from unbelievers regarding how to make it to heaven. The problem with this solution is that the bible says a person will never be saved by trusting in his own good works. On the contrary, a person is saved by grace alone. “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith – and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God – not by works, so that no one can boast.” Ephesians 2:8-9.

During Luke Skywalker’s assault on the Death Star, he is tempted to forsake using the Force and rely merely on his X-wing fighter’s computer and his own ability. His mission is to fire a torpedo into the Death Star’s very small exhaust shaft, a feat that one of his comrades states is “impossible even for a computer”. So, there he sits, his squadron almost completely destroyed, as the Death Star closes in on destroying the Rebel’s base. While he peers through the computer’s targeting scope, he hears the words of Obi-Wan Kenobi, “Use the Force, Luke”. Luke looks away and then back to the scope. “Let go, Luke.” Another pause, “Luke, trust me.” Luke heads the words of his former master and turns off the computer. Immediately, he receives communication from the Rebel command center, “Luke, you switched off your targeting computer! What’s wrong?” Luke replies, “Nothing, I’m all right.” Isn’t that amazing? The moment he doesn’t rely on the computer, everyone panics. This is the same negative response the world gives to those who rely on God’s grace alone and not in their own worth to be saved. Nonetheless, just like Luke, we must say to ourselves “Nothing is wrong. I’m all right”.

Well, if you are reading this blog, I am certain you know how it turns out. Luke uses only the Force, nails the exhaust port, and saves the Rebel base. The reason this is such a character arc for Luke and an example for us is that he had to make a decision, trust the Force or trust the computer. The two choices are mutually exclusive. You can’t be trusting in the Force, but also be using the targeting computer just in case the ole’ Force is having a bad day. No, it’s one or the other. That is exactly the way it is with bowing the knee to Christ and living for him. You have to surrender every possible treasure you have ever relied on or will rely on for strength, identity, and security and confess that you are a no-good sinner whose very best moral achievements warrant never-ending torture. This means that anything a professing Christian might be doing like reading the bible, teaching Sunday school, praying, giving money to the church, listening to Christian radio, or being involved in ubiquitous church programs and activities could send them on the fast track straight to hell if they are not doing it out of a deep love for God.
Like how Yoda said to Luke, either do trust in God’s grace or do not. Do not try to play both sides of the fence, or at the end of your life, you will receive the same type of harsh words Jesus will say to the church in Laodicea, “I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm – neither hot nor cold – I am about to spit you out of my mouth.” Revelation 3:15-16. God has never and will never save anybody just because they go to church and try to be a good person. Just the opposite, the only way to be saved is by humbling yourself and fully relying on God’s grace resulting in a transformed life from the inside out. My closing encouragement is especially to those who are not sure of their salvation. In a certain way, I hope this blog scares you into examining what or who you are trusting in, and if it is not in grace alone, that you would repent in faith. Finally, if you think you might be desiring a real relationship with God, ask him to give you the eyes to see your sin and your desperate need for his truly amazing and “unmerited” grace.

9 Responses to “Star Wars, Part 3”

  1. Hi Bradley.

    Can I put forward some thoughts? I agree with the thrust of what you were saying, of course- salvation from the first to last is all of grace, and the main motivation for obedience is gratitude. But how do you know that such an acceptance of “God’s grace” over the alternative of someone’s self-effort isn’t just “easy-believism”, and is then coupled with a (nice) legal self effort in sanctification to make it look like saving faith? It’s, surely, possible to say (and think) that I do such and such out of gratitude and I give my assent to biblical justification etc, but still not have the “repentance unto life” that saves, the repentance which is of the gospel, not of law. I am thinking that the strength of the gospel lies in the fact that its a gospel of (gracious) repentance that frees someone from the power of sin in freeing them from the penalty…God requires a repentance from men that is a total turnaround, which we can’t give apart from regeneration, and which he’s made provision for by his grace, through faith.

    I hope you don’t mind me saying that I feel that we should steer clear of reading a “Christian message” onto things like Star Wars…especially because its predicated, without your perspective, on a spread of philosophies from the world system- mysticism, pluralism, pantheism, Pelagianism. At least it echoes Pelagianism within mystical parameters, and with the preponderance of that, and semi-Pelagianism in “evangelicalism,” I think it’s best avoided.

    Phil

  2. Hi Phil,

    Thanks for taking the time to read this blog and post a comment. Addressing your second paragraph first, I encourage you to read part 1 of the Star Wars blog. There, I basically explain that even though Star Wars is by no means a “Christian” movie, the Lord still uses it to remind me of biblical truths.

    Regarding your first paragraph, would you please post again to clarify your question? I am not following your thought. Thanks.

    –Bradley

  3. Hello Bradley,

    I really appreciate your thoughts from Star Wars. Keep up the good work. It is always encouraging to me to take all of life and seek connections to my Christian worldview. That is what this post helps us all to do.

    Hello Phil,
    I can understand your hesitancy in “reading into” movies our Christian worldview. If I thought Bradley was telling us this is what the filmmaker intended by the particular scenes he chose, I would have the same problem. I don’t think that is Bradley’s point here. What I would suggest is that Bradley is seeking to look for truth in the midst of stories. When he des this, he must always bring it back to Scripture to show that what he is presenting is actually true, but he does not need to show the author or filmmaker intended that to be the point. What I enjoy about this is several things. First, it helps me to interact with my world. The more I can look at things around me and filter them through God’s word, the better off I am. Movies are a powerful part of many peoples’ lives. Being able to see biblical points in them even when they were not intended is helpful for my growth and discernment. Second, it helps me to interact with the culture around me because I can use illustrations and references that they are familiar with. This is very similar to Paul’s use of poetry and idols in Acts 17.

    Anyway, that is my two cents. Hope it helps throw some light on why this exercise can be encouraging and edifying.

    Michael

  4. Hi Bradley,
    Very well fleshed out points. Although I dont follow Star Wars..this is pretty good since you have written the bulk of this without using StarWars allegory. The fundamental point with all man-made works of literature or poetry or films or Quran or Vedas/Gita is that it can never catch the essence of the Gospel because its all man made. True divine relevation is needed to bring out the gospel of Grace. But man made works are a good starting point since people are familiar with and enarmoured by them to lead them to the real revealation. Also a good vehicle to contrast that these are all man-made(since some claim some form of revelation) since they never come to the real heart of the problem – sin or the solution – “unmerited grace”.
    ~P

  5. […] All of you Star Wars fans should check out the latest blog by Bradley Hagan on the IDS site. The post can be found here. […]

  6. Bradley, great use of a great quote. I have always loved that one and you have done it justice. Good thoughts!

  7. -Chaps; wrote most of this a few days ago and didn’t really want to put it up, but I will do cos Bradley, at least, as expecting me to reply- Phil

    Hello Bradley and Michael,

    Michael, I know that Bradley doesn’t think that the filmmaker intended Bradley’s take on his film, but that he’s looked for Christian parallels by seeing it through his discerning eye. But I think that maybe the two can become confused in the mind of the less discerning. Many “Christians” watching a film like Star Wars will have a certain eye to a message, and get the wrong end of the stick. I think rather than the Lord directly “using” a film etc to one’s benefit, rather we grow by “testing all things” discerningly in where they stand in opposition to the truth, being transformed by the renewing of our minds.

    With respect to helping you to interact with the culture around you, don’t you think it would be better to choose rather “inert” illustrations, that cannot lead to any confusion? Like everyday things that in and of themselves are harmeless. Apologetics that seeks carefully to remove any stumbling blocks that may be there, operating strictly within the parameters of non-negotiable propositions of the faith, such as the depravity of the mind; which if it can misunderstand something, it will? I think Acts 17 is different from this type of illustration. Paul’s just directly pointing out that those philosophers gave evidence of a creational awareness of God and his providence, that renders them without excuse for not worshipping him truly, and, now Christ, raised from the dead, manifestly bears witness to the resurrection of the dead to judgement and requires their repentance. Paul’s very direct.

    Bradley, with respect to my first paragraph, I was rambling a bit. I just wanted to say that I think its possible to have an “easy-believist” “as if” trusting in grace alone, for payment of debt, and seemingly living out of gratitude in obedience, while his gospel didn’t involve a biblical repentance in the first place. We need to be so clear that the gospel that saves demands an active repentance from us from all sin, not “just” the sin of trusting to ourselves that we are righteous. I’m sorry if I came across as unappreciative of you. Keep up the good work.

    Phil

  8. Hi Phil,

    I agree with you, that as the book of James tells us, real faith will show evidence. That is, repentance from all sin should characterize the believer’s life. I touch on the importance of this in my first blog. Thanks for your comments.

    –Bradley

  9. I was actually refering to the once-and-for-all “repentance unto life” that accompanies, and is predicated on, saving faith at justification; rather than the repentance “of life.” I was just dwelling on the necessity and reality that the gospel holds out a once-for-all “deliverance from sin” that is both required and provided for, in grace. Spurgeon’s really helpful discussion of it comes to mind in his book “All of Grace.” I reckon its fairly widespread (this relates to my other post I think on the believer’s relationship to law) that “repentance” often has a works tone, rather than a gospel tone about it.

    I am just thinking aloud, and I’m not saying that you disagree. I hope that I’m heading in the right direction, and not the wrong on these things.

    Phil

Leave a Reply